Latest Research on Carbon Sequestration: Nov – 2019

Trading Water for Carbon with Biological Carbon Sequestration

Carbon sequestration ways highlight tree plantations while not considering their full environmental consequences. we tend to combined field analysis, synthesis of quite 600 observations, and climate and economic modeling to document substantial losses in stream flow, and exaggerated soil salinization and activity, with conversion. Plantations attenuated stream flow by 227 millimeters p.a. globally (52%), with thirteen of streams drying fully for a minimum of one year. Regional modeling of U.S. plantation situations suggests that climate feedbacks ar unlikely to offset such water losses and will exacerbate them. Plantations will facilitate management groundwater recharge and upwelling however cut back stream flow and salinize and acidify some soils. [1]

Conservation tillage for carbon sequestration

World soils represent the most important terrestrial pool of organic carbon (C), concerning 1550 Pg compared with about 700 Pg within the atmosphere and 600 Pg in land biology. Agricultural activities (e.g., deforestation, burning, plowing, intensive grazing) contribute significantly to the part pool. growth of agriculture could have contributed considerably to the part carbon pool. However, the precise magnitude of carbon fluxes from soil to the atmosphere and from land biology to the soil aren’t familiar. a vital objective of the property management of soil resources is to extend soil organic carbon (SOC) pool by increasing passive or non-labile fraction. Soil surface management, soil conservation and management, and soil fertility regulation are all vital aspects of carbon sequestration in soil. Conservation tillage, a generic term implying all tillage strategies that cut back runoff and erosion as compared with plow-based tillage, is thought to extend SOC content of the surface layer. [2]

Carbon sequestration

Developing technologies to scale back the speed of increase of part concentration of greenhouse emission (CO2) from annual emissions of eight.6 Pg C yr–1 from energy, method trade, land-use conversion and soil cultivation is a vital issue of the ordinal century. Of the 3 choices of reducing the worldwide energy use, developing low or no-carbon fuel and sequestering emissions, this manuscript describes processes for carbon (CO2) sequestration and discusses abiotic and organic phenomenon technologies. Carbon sequestration implies transfer of part dioxide into different long international pools together with oceanic, pedologic, organic phenomenon and geologic strata to scale back cyberspace rate of increase in part dioxide. Engineering techniques of dioxide injection in deep ocean, geologic strata, previous coal mines and oil wells, and saline aquifers beside mineral pervasion of dioxide represent abiotic techniques. These techniques have an outsized potential of thousands of Pg, area unit costly, have discharge risks and should be out there for routine use by 2025 and on the far side. [3]

Future nitrogen availability and its effect on carbon sequestration in Northern Eurasia

Nitrogen (N) convenience exerts sturdy management on carbon storage within the forests of Northern continent. Here, employing a process-based model, we tend to explore however 3 factors that alter N availability—permafrost degradation, atmospherical N deposition, and also the abandonment of agricultural land to forest regrowth (land-use legacy)—affect carbon storage within the region’s forest vegetation over the twenty first century at intervals the context of 2 IPCC global-change situations (RCPs four.5 and 8.5). For RCP4.5, increased N convenience leads to exaggerated tree carbon storage of twenty seven.8 Pg C, with land-use heritage being the foremost vital issue. [4]

Carbon Sequestration Potential of a Few Selected Tree Species in Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu

A study was conducted to understand the carbon sequestration potential of few selected  tree species at Forest faculty and analysis Institute, Mettupalayam. twenty six tree species were selected  and categorised into completely different height category as 0-3 m, 3-6 m and 6-9 m from numerous establishments of Coimbatore. the expansion parameters like height, Diameter at Breast Height were recorded and calculable the biomass carbon. The calculated biomass was then regenerate into mass of carbon sequestered. These information allowed U.S.A. to estimate the overall mass of carbon sequestered. most biomass accumulation was recorded tall category six m to nine m found in peacock flower (157.64 metric weight unit tree-1) and therefore the minimum was recorded in Gmelina arborea (0.19 metric weight unit tree-1) within the height category 0-3 m. [5]


[1] Jackson, R.B., Jobbágy, E.G., Avissar, R., Roy, S.B., Barrett, D.J., Cook, C.W., Farley, K.A., Le Maitre, D.C., McCarl, B.A. and Murray, B.C., 2005. Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration. science, 310(5756), (Web Link)

[2] Lal, R. and Kimble, J.M., 1997. Conservation tillage for carbon sequestration. Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 49(1-3), (Web Link)

[3] Lal, R., 2007. Carbon sequestration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1492), (Web Link)

[4] Future nitrogen availability and its effect on carbon sequestration in Northern Eurasia
David W. Kicklighter, Jerry M. Melillo, Erwan Monier, Andrei P. Sokolov & Qianlai Zhuang
Nature Communications volume 10, (2019) (Web Link)

[5] Sangareswari @ Nagajothi, M., R. Manju hashini, A., Balasubramanian, A., Palanikumaran, B. and Aswini, D. (2018) “Carbon Sequestration Potential of a Few Selected Tree Species in Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu”, Advances in Research, 14(4), (Web Link)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *